KO ZA DOSEGANJE NAJBOLJ "MODERNIH" CILJEV UPORABIJO ENEGA NAJSTAREJŠIH TRIKOV...




AIDS je novi trojanski konj za digitalne ID-je, ki je zdaj povezan s spolom in statusom HIV.

Najprej so uporabili prepovedi potovanj in vzbujanja strahu pred covidom19, vendar jim ni uspelo pridobiti dovolj velikega števila mladih na digitalne osebne izkaznice, da bi uravnotežili tiste, ki se jim upirajo, zato zdaj uporabljajo seks in strah pred aidsom, da bi uvedli svoj sistem digitalne ID za naslednje generacije.

P.S.
Za zapisnik, virus HIV in bolezen AIDS sta ločeni vprašanji, saj je bilo tisto, kar so imenovali AIDS, posledica prevelikega odmerjanja farmacevtskega "zdravila", imenovanega "AZT", ki je bil namesto toksina, na skoraj enak način kot "cepivo" C19 in ponavljajoče se "poživitve" so toksini, zaradi česar je okužba s SARSCOV2 tako verjetnejša kot tudi slabša.

Referenčni članek:
"Vzpon in padec AZT: zdravilo je moralo delovati. Prineslo je upanje ljudem s HIV in aidsom ter milijone podjetju, ki ga je razvilo. Moralo je delovati. Nič drugega ni bilo. Toda za mnoge, ki so uporabljal AZT - ni"

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/the-rise-and-fall-of-azt-it-was-the-drug-that-had-to-work-it-brought-hope-to-people-with-hiv-and-aids-and-millions-for-the-company-that-developed-it-it-had-to-work-there-was-nothing-else-but-for-many-who-used-2320491.html



Tukaj ste najprej slišali.

Robin Monotti in Cory Morningstar

t.me/robinmg


2015 raziskava za pridobitev funkcije, ki potrjuje uporabo
psevdovirusa HIV, v SARSCOV, izdelanega v Wuhanu:

2015 gain of function research confirming HIV
pseudovirus used in SARSCOV made in Wuhan

2015: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount, Jr, [...], and Ralph S Baric

"Pseudotyping experiments were similar to those using an 👉HIV-based pseudovirus, prepared as previously described10, and examined on HeLa cells (Wuhan Institute of Virology) that expressed ACE2 orthologs."

"In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/#!po=46.9512



Montagnier potrjuje, da je HIV RNA v samem virusu SARS COV 2:

Montagnier confirming HIV RNA is in the SARSCOV2 virus itself:

Another interesting article on recently passed Luc Montagnier - his commentary on "HIV RNA viral segments spliced surgically within the COVID-19 genome" and his research on optical biophysics.

April 30, 2020:

Excerpt:

This April 16th, Dr. Luc Montagnier became a household name around the world. This occurred as the controversial virologist decided to publicly state his support for the theory that Covid-19 is indeed a laboratory-generated creation and not a naturally occurring effect of viral evolution.

Referring to a study published at the Kusama School of Biology in New Dehli on January 31st, Montagnier (the 2008 Nobel Prize winner for his 1983 discovery of the HIV virus) made the point that the specific occurrence of HIV RNA viral segments spliced surgically within the COVID-19 genome could not have originated naturally and he described it in the following words:

“We have carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus. We weren’t the first, a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study showing that the complete genome of this virus that has within the sequences of another virus: that of HIV.”

While the Indian team was induced to retract their publication under immense pressure from the mainstream medical establishment (which never bothered to seriously refute the content of the study’s research but rather used the “random-mutation-makes-anything-possible” argument), Montagnier stated “scientific truth always emerges”.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/04/30/big-pharma-beware-dr-montagnier-shines-new-light-on-covid-19-and-the-future-of-medicine/



"Sponka" HIV v preizkusnem "cepivu" C19, za katerega trdijo, da je bil zaustavljen,
vendar je bilo kaj drugače pri drugih injekcijah mRNA?

HIV "clamp" in C19 "vaccine" attempt they claim was paused
yet was it any different to other mRNA injections?


This research is from a vaccine attempt that they claim was paused, yet was it any different than the other mRNA spike protein coding?

"All participants who received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a humoral response that was detected by several commonly used HIV diagnostic tests.

Although the geometric mean for vaccine cross-reactivity was 30 times lower than the geometric mean for samples from a randomly selected set of 50 patients with HIV, it was within the range of nine of these patients with HIV.

Therefore, widespread use of this vaccine would have the potential to impact existing HIV screening programmes and processes and could ultimately delay timely diagnosis for a subset of patients with HIV.

Additionally, where a climate of vaccine hesitancy exists, the potential negative effects of miscommunication and misunderstanding of this issue, and the potential for societal misconception around the inclusion of HIV-1 glycoprotein 41 regions within a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, could not be ignored and further development of this vaccine is currently paused."

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00200-0/fulltext



Pfizer-Biontech in protein HIV v injekcijah C19

Pzifer-Biontech & HIV protein in the C19 injections


PFIZER-BIONTECH & HIV

This is from biontech patent documents, it seems they also wanted to make a version of Covid 19 vaccine with some protein from HIV. This photo is from the answer received from the patent commision.

Did they go ahead with this?

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=EP339772738&_fid=EP339772736




Vir: Telegram kanal
https://t.me/robinmg/15598


881 views0 comments